The National Chairman of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, has criticised President Bola Tinubu’s efficiency, describing him as a failure and alleging that he has little to supply Nigerians because the 2027 normal elections method.
Baba-Ahmed made the remarks throughout an interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today, the place he faulted the administration over worsening insecurity, financial hardship and the results of its insurance policies on residents.
“Tinubu inherited Nigeria, but what has he done with it? He inherited a poor country; he inherited weak institutions; he inherited poverty and insecurity. We don’t blame him, but he’s been in power for three and a half years. He is a failure,” he mentioned.
The PRP chairman additionally questioned experiences that the president supposed to restrict his marketing campaign appearances to a couple places, arguing that Tinubu ought to meet Nigerians instantly and clarify his insurance policies and their affect on their residing circumstances.
“Why doesn’t Tinubu commit himself to say, I will. I have the energy, I have the intention, I want to see Nigerians, I want Nigerians to see me, I want them to hear me explain why they are more hungry,” Baba-Ahmed mentioned.
When requested why he thought Tinubu had indicated that he would go to just a few locations in the course of the marketing campaign, Baba-Ahmed mentioned the president lacked convincing solutions for the citizens.
“Yes, he has nothing to say to them, I’m telling you, he has nothing to say to Nigerians.”
He additional challenged the president’s reported choice to delegate marketing campaign actions to others whereas remaining in Abuja, questioning his document in workplace.
“The reason why he said, Go, gentlemen, go and campaign for me. I will stay here in Abuja and run the country. You’re running the country now? For three and a half years, you didn’t run the country, now you remember that you are here to run the country?”
Baba-Ahmed additionally condemned the administration’s financial reforms, arguing that the troublesome selections made by Tinubu had imposed higher hardship on residents somewhat than bettering their welfare.
“He (Tinubu) made some tough decisions but they were anti-people decisions, a tough decision doesn’t have to be a good decision,” he mentioned.
On schooling, the PRP chairman questioned the advantages of the administration’s insurance policies, significantly for kids in communities affected by insecurity, the place assaults by bandits and kidnappers have disrupted entry to education.
“You talk about creating loans, that’s good, but do you know how many millions of children that can’t go to school under Tinubu’s watch in this country? Children who live in territories taken over by bandits, kidnappers, and who can’t go to school at all?”
He additionally argued that the safety scenario had worsened beneath Tinubu’s management.
“Security has gotten considerably worse, it has never been worse like this,” he mentioned.
Baba-Ahmed dismissed the administration’s presentation of financial figures as propaganda, insisting that official statistics didn’t replicate the difficulties confronted by peculiar Nigerians.
“All these things you mentioned, this is the propaganda. Unfortunately, for Tinubu, Nigerians are not going to buy it. Children are not going to school, life is more insecure, life is harder,” he mentioned.
He additional questioned the president’s enchantment for an additional four-year time period, arguing that it trusted persuading Nigerians to endure current hardships in anticipation of future enhancements.
“He flashes all these statistics, he is saying, give me a second chance, even Tinubu will not say he made lives more better, what he will say is that yes, we are going through a difficult part, if you give me another four years, we will get better,” Baba-Ahmed mentioned.
The PRP chairman additionally challenged the timing and implementation of the administration’s financial insurance policies, arguing that their probably penalties ought to have been thought-about earlier than they have been launched.
“You said the microeconomics is good, those are statistics that they use and they will tell you, if you give me another four years, I will see them. Sir, if you knew you had four years within which you’ll embark on a profoundly influential policy, shouldn’t you look at it first of all and say, I’m going to have four years and if I embark on these policies, it will have major economic impacts.”
He maintained {that a} accountable president ought to assess how financial selections would have an effect on residents’ speedy wants and livelihoods earlier than implementing them.
“A thinking president will say let me do one or two things first, because I will impoverish people and the cost of transportation is vital and central to everything.”
We’ve received the sting. Get real-time experiences, breaking scoops, and unique angles delivered straight to your cellphone. Don’t accept stale information. Join LEADERSHIP NEWS on WhatsApp for twenty-four/7 updates →
